Showing posts with label GPR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GPR. Show all posts

Friday, 17 September 2021

Everything You Need to Know About GPR and Underground Utility Locating


For underground utility locating, GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) works as a corresponding tool to EM. Whereas the EM method is used to locate active utilities beneath the ground, GPR utility location services help locate and identify different elements that are different from their surroundings. 

Let's take a look at two of the most common yet challenging scenarios and how we can make the most out of the underground utility locating data available:

1.      Multiple Targets

In the presence of multiple buried targets such as rocks, roots, trees, etc., separating buried utilities from them can be quite challenging. Before planning any excavation, one needs to identify target responses from different depths and oriented in different directions.

2.      Weak Targets

Varied composition targets result in highly fluctuated GPR reflection responses depending upon the different soil conditions and depth.  Also, as the composition of conduit utilities and non-metallic pipes contrasts with the properties of the host material, they often create weak responses. In such instances when the response is weak, targets are usually overlooked.

Strategies That Can Help Get the Most from the Available Data


1.      MapView & Interpretation

During underground utility locating, existing records of utility maps offer initial assistance. Further, one needs to create site sketch maps based on observed targets and features. MapView allows us to see the entire surveyed area with all the analysis precisely marked on the screen.

While collecting data, the utility location services provider adds colour-coded interpretations which provides discrimination between the targets and ensures that all the targets are market.

To ensure that the entire area is properly covered, pay special attention to the direction, pattern and spacing of the ground-penetrating radar data path.

2.      Depth Slicing

When there are multiple utilities underneath the ground, depth slicing is the best tool to look for linear subsurface. It collects GPR data at varying depths and generates a 2D map image for the same. The latest GPR (ground penetrating radar) systems direct the locator through set-up, data collection, processing and exhibit depth slice. GPR with accurate GPS allows you to produce a depth slice from the line collection.

As depth slicing helps to visualise the targets and highlight utilities, it can widely help with the first challenge.

3.      Interpretation Overlaid on Depth Slices

For MapViews of user-selected utilities, depth slicing works as a complimentary. For the weak responses that aren't highlighted in a depth slice, MapView allows the utility location services provider to highlight those responses to the best of his experience and knowledge. The combination of depth slicing and MapViews has proven to be highly beneficial in complex areas.

When the target responses in the GPR cross-section are too weak to appear in a depth slice but are visible to the naked eye, it is advised to map the weak hyperbolas. This can be done by adding user selected point interpretation to the weak responses.

There is a range of varied options available to choose the interpretation colour to place on a hyperbola. 

  • Choose interpretation colour based on the colour code of utility marking
  • Choose the colour code based on the hyperbolic response strength


What's Important is to Choose One Colour Convention and Stick to it Throughout the Project?


Once the point interpretations are added, look in the MapView for the patterns made by interpretations. Some might line up, representing a linear object (mostly a utility) while some might not line up, those are point targets. Adding interpretations and overlaying them on depth slices helps identify and map utilities that do not appear on the depth slices.

Interpretations and depth slicing are the key methods to untangle complex excavation sites and identify missed utilities as a result of their weak responses. Undoubtedly, safety and damage prevention is of paramount importance for safe excavation.

To ensure accurate underground utility locating and mapping, hire professional locators and use all the tools to their best potential.

Author's Bio:

Jon Armstrong possesses immense knowledge related to GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) and underground utility mapping. For several years, he's been associated with GeoScan Utility &Structural Investigation, renowned underground locators known for providing accurate and timely information related to underground pipe location and much more.

Sunday, 18 May 2014

GPR vs. X-Ray, Choose According to Your Needs



When it comes to technologies regarding underground services in Melbourne and Geelong areas, confusion between GPR — ground penetrating radar and X-Ray is bound to happen.

Let us have a look at some of the basics of both of them.


GPR — Ground Penetrating Radar

GPR technology exploits safer radio waves as opposed to gamma rays used in concrete x-ray technology. One of the greatest things that differentiate GPR from x-ray technology is its capacity to give real time results. Underground services providers use ground penetrating radar precisely for this reason.

X-Ray

The term is very often misleading as many builders when they approach underground services provider use this to mean GPR. One of the reasons for the confusion is that this is an old technology which is accurately called cement or concrete radiography. Its main purpose is to identify any object underground by taking x-ray images of the layers. While x-ray images are quite clear compared to GPR facts, it often consumes more time. Also, since it uses gamma rays, nearby places need to be evacuated before carrying out x-ray imaging.


Points of Comparison


Accessibility: Ground penetrating radar allows to access only one side of the slab for scanning whereas concrete radiography allows access to both the sides of slabs. In that sense, GPR has limitations as far as thickness of the slabs are concerned. While using x-ray, one side takes the film while the other a reflector plate. Devices based on iridium radiography, can penetrate up to twelve inches whereas devices that use cobalt radiography can go down up to maximum thirty-six inches.

Resolution: Since, ground penetrating radar uses only one side of the slab, the resolution often gets blurry whereas x-ray technique yields better resolution of the slabs.

Cost: As the ground penetrating radar technology is getting evolved, the cost associated with it is getting lower in comparison to concrete radiography. Following are reasons why concrete radiography is expensive:

  • Concrete x-ray is confined to one section at a time
  • Also, during x-ray scanning, nearby places need to be evacuated which causes loss of time
  • Technologically, GPR allows the use of digital image even after the test. This makes processing and manipulation lot easier and less expensive
  • Compared to GPR, concrete radiography requires more expensive training as well as equipments

What to use when


Though it is true that GPR is replacing concrete radiography quite faster, it depends on your requirement which technology is best suited to your projects. Professional and experienced underground services providers in Melbourne and Geelong areas listen to your requirements carefully and then decide the best suitable technique.

These are some of the factors that play a major role in deciding which technique is best suited to your project. Ponder over these factors, check with professionals if you are still not sure which of these should best suit you, and make an informed choice before you actually start your ambitious project.